No. 24-5820
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acceptance-of-responsibility criminal-procedure first-circuit obstruction-of-justice sentencing-guidelines united-states-sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming a two-level sentencing enhancement for obstruction of justice and denying acceptance of responsibility credit
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred by summarily affirming the district court’s imposition of a two-level offense increase for obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Il. Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred by summarily affirming the district court’s denial of credit for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1(a) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. i
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2024)
Attorneys
Tevon Ngomba
J. Daniel Silverman — J. Daniel Silverman, Esq., Petitioner
J. Daniel Silverman — J. Daniel Silverman, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent