Whether lower courts can deny habeas corpus access, proceed without proper affidavits, and maintain Article III jurisdiction despite jury acquittal

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Can lower courts, delay and deny access to Habeas Corpus, and maintain Constitutional adherence? 2) Can a District court proceed with a “case” against a person, without an affidavit supported complaint being filed, one warranting the persons arrest? 3) Can a lower court maintain Article III jurisdiction, over money laundry when structuring is found to be not-evidenced and acquittal awarded by the Trial Jury? : 4) Is a Grand Jury designed, for the purposes of protecting public citizens right under the Constitution, as outlined in Rule 6(a)’s opening line? 5) May the search of bank records, be initiated without record evidence of any search warrant, supported by affidavit of criminal conduct? 6) If public interests of victims were the concern of the United States, why is there NO restitution in Petitioner’s case? Why no tax evasion charges?