Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state lifetime ban on Second Amendment rights for felons, particularly in light of the January 6th insurrection

QUESTION PRESENTED Q, Does Amendment XIV To The United States Constitution Equal Protection Clause Constitutionally Impermissible Prohibits all States not limited to and including The State Of North Carolina from imposing a [Lifetime-ban] on the second I] amendment right to keep and bear arms. In other words, [section 14-415.1] of North Carolina General Statute has [Now] become bad law and unconstitutional written on its face, to be sure, upon a [New set of facts], having failed to provide [felons] with any constitutional safeguard protections to defend themselves against the january 06, 2021 free, unprosecuted and violent insurrectionists and, as such, having arbitrary enacted and maintains a law that treat some differently than others who are similarly situated inlight of an ongoing and imminent [nuisance] of [threatened injury] being imposed against felons due to no fault of their own. ? QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Q, ‘Whether the fourth circuit court of appeals [July 9th, 2024] Judgment is in error, having based and rested its [conclusion] upon an outright [manifest injustice], whereas here, it identified the correct governing legal rule, and reviewed the case on its merits, then, failed its obligation to law, having [departure] where it concluded that the district court did not [‘abused its discretion’] and affirmed the judgment [contrary to] this court's prior and recent rulings.’ To wit, the [reviewing panel] limited its [reviewing scope] to the issues raised in the [informal brief] having relied on the court’s [Rule.34(b)] meaning that, the court reviewed the matter upon the [merits]. Then, thereafter [departure] from a normal standard practice review, to be sure, it reached a conclusion [contrary to] the governing laws, resulting in the deprivation of a fair hearing that which denied the petitioner/ appellant of a [meaningful access] to court. Therefore and accordingly, that court erred in law and should be reversed. 2