Whether the Federal Court erred in ordering demonstrative defects in a pro se litigant's petition alleging constitutional rights violations

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . _ : 1) Whether or not did the Federal Court error when it ordered demonstrative defect in Pro-se litigants ; ; : atition that raised constitutional right violations when Pro-se litigants are given more freedom to : comes defects? : a : 2.) When officers state they didnt see the accused committing a crime. Is it Constitutional to seize an . identity and perform a search of evidence to justify an arrest? . : 3.) Whether or not the Constitution upholds suggestive identification procedures without a emergency — or urgency Constitutional? 4.) Whether or not is the filing of a intiation of a prosecution by Bill Of Information for a Felony outside the limitations window is Constitutional in any Jurisdiction? . 5.) Where does the Constitution charts for State representitives permission to disobey a judges order to disclose for trial? , . ; 6.) Is it Constitutional to administer evidence during a trial who's nature proved nothing in the committing of the alleged offense? : 7.) When a victim/witness indicates confidence in their statement. Is it Constitutional to REFRESH from previous testimony while on trial in testimony? | 8.) When a counsel remains silent with knowledge of Constitutional deprivements more than 6 times. Do the counsel's silence and failure to object meets the standard of a competent effective counsel? | me,