Whether the California Supreme Court's denial of a writ of habeas corpus based on procedural grounds violated the appellant's constitutional right to due process and meaningful judicial review
No question identified. : F Quechons Pes en _ n, | Did He 055Chalo4 alt nipolanon ac eS ed fromtorig Vola Galbolts Right to due _pentrss 5 Ch 1GuJ under: Xne Oe) fo. ds Awvendme u , © (hey the Totally of Cccnnstances, wes Ye yf wate Cause _o ts ynlssien ; Wiki, it ular} a vs vidlahinn Ws ah IL } fs (3 of law under Met Fourke : reenamen te ; : wolite Gopellgnts talk wv aha , _ ibe fe hs & © “sage Th an F Proless & lw umder He FL and Fourteen wendingats becouse declavechun | ———} a Peal iflrests’ isnot Vil (oled SY DE Ye Avia) Cat _ece tn boiling 4p inchy _ — \ Did the Commlahve eect of the Pre dodien , sro the errors deonve appellant of hi __ Ca 1 a Mac, dye 9rOCCSS , GN to Dusen ee a eo : i i — Pe po Re __ Lich ot Pay Ves AN puckes apgeor tb Ane _Cooyhon tthe sen fhe Corer Paarye 7 [All Qube to not appeaein the Cadhin of | the Cusp nde we pe As ck) pack LS AnogWes Couns SupCt. Wo KAWGHST Welubd Cages _ , & Saylin Galbolt VU Warren Mon layers | NOV2A\ty Ao 4oPAARMS US. Dette Cena Grit of Gilthenin. Su, cot -enkere | G]241v PD 2 Savlin Gaol} uv. Wari Monkey NOV 95 629). . 2S Cort a Appeals for 4 he Nth icant. Posie u Gat no 90080, 05. Supreme Couet_of Coblornin.. drdgoent enters on 6} 0/2] | pe ___TAQLE GE Con TENTS | p——fesan aging he than aol _— | Kopenix A:Detician c€ sede Cour of Appeals | —_ |Ropendik RL Detigan of Sal Awl ouer ependix © Deccion ob Shake Supreme Court. | BP Pe BP Po | Tn THe | Svpveme Cover of HE a . UNITED SIATE S Pt Detthon For Wel of (echoari ‘ Lehtinen Roped ly pres Anat owt of Cecherratt a Sve ty wuew Ane Suto}nen Ye 10 « PINTONS BELOW po Cems Avom_ ed ‘cs\ Cots The OPinion of the _vnted States Court Oo Appeals LT repor ‘ as bee ‘the OPinion e Unid Skaks dishic CO Nec | sa Prone dix ee ie and is J Oo iC ad O L Qe aqnaitn eed Wonk yt meal oe ke | : of a oc ( ‘ Sik nw e (Prion co the nae Sole Court by canes the Mecits appees ot Adnendit Co b> Yhe _pebbein ans Teper o_o LA he been _desanatd toc pdbliahon bots oak yek tepork. a . oc | Vis unpubl Or . , 3 | (he (Pine & Abe Secord ack (out _g % append tothe pebhin and is [ sarkd esiQ tA tor Dub liccenin Ne 6 hot er ean ted { SURI SDLA Li tor eg Arom Khecol (loots: decided Mu (Ke pL Ano vebhun Se reer we held Cek ny _Ihny Case he_\nrted aus (a 0 Aoten\ On +he Collawen fe ane a to : Jurigdychon Ff} hs Court WG _oug ed UNde 2B. USC 2254 CY), , : (ase was 00 6130121 A Copy of Yt Woes ire it OPpen dix | ; : LS An extnsin of tie _b the ne fea7hon OW | Cb Cerhorwri we Mn 9 by and including Cate) on. (dite) erin Hpoluctam (oA TALE Ment OF CASE | ft Jury (3 (ound Gallolt gully cL beck deeyee p fmeter fo Cons & cheno kd Orem htaled mune, and one Count eb Sheohng ito an }-——— fia dwelling Dcbed Gn ain hug d 14,2017 Fond ofng_alleyhars on. {he to Pian BD) ‘lhe rntcncrs amelian tp. 7S Nes yp \fe rane _ (BeL_ 254 V0 wear Te Gott ok Moped Coverved oe Comat oF remmeds tated | aHanpled Monten, reducing Coadbolt's Sentante by, Yo year mas (fe, but atherwée d Urmed Ae \bagment. C oe 5% | Mod Opn-2) . _ — ee ee PO fee — eureus_| peCewny ‘to address 7imbor ant — weshons OF law. APodllant urges hy (our Grant Tutu to decide “uo impor _ isoues OF law telaled to ne Perkins overchon eee ere Ane deceotive errr hon’ 40 Ms. Us ___ ho 6 ele Aoe_she des \ause_ Of | the toot a a folic Od whether the: \uece_lawtol Wher cy Were uYed ty dehboetubcly Cicwmven! ‘te Orotedun AStersed ty Godloolt Woler the Ath 2 end ment. Oa labs re, Ais Court Shald vray | Revies ty delernnned ulnether Coagrelons ts uise was inveshaatory he Subsequent | [carci s on Godlolt ard Roy were besh mona Decawe they were Oho Primarily Quned Cr Gathering Cuidence wa ProSe Cuhon +» | Ce ee a azz TonClLST6n A Pe PT RT Re ee ee Nakd lolz] 2 Qecpect hy Scberrtled_ ee Ps ee ee eee a ee ee ee