No. 24-5837
Ruben Aguilera v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review armed-career-criminal-act certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure jury-determination section-2255
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a petitioner in his initial § 2255 stage who has preserved the claim that a jury must decide the 'occasions' clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act receive a Certificate of Appealability in light of Erlinger v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED [1] May a petitioner in his initial § 2255 stage who has preserved the claim that a jury must decide the "occasions" clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act receive a-Certificate of Appealability in light of Erlinger v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1840 (2024)? li .
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-25
Reply of petitioner Ruben Aguilera filed. (Distributed)
2025-01-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2025.
2024-12-10
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2024 to January 15, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-14
Response Requested. (Due December 16, 2024)
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent