Andrey L. Bridges v. Patricia Blackmon, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether courts should resolve the longstanding conflict regarding the right to sue government officials in their individual or official capacity for depriving a citizen of constitutional rights
No question identified. : \ LQUESTION[S] PRESENTED + 1. Whether this court should resolve the longstanding conflict among the right to sue officials in their individual or official capacity, where the official uses their entity under the arm of the government to stop a citizen from invoking his personal right of the First Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? 2. Where a litigant presents a civil suit under §1983 and states a claim that he is injured and deprived of; First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment, and has shown the injury, did he also state within the injury the injunction relief, and presented that a declaratory decree was violated without necessarily elaborating? 3. Whether court(s) unreasonably applies Section 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) to deprive significance rights to access the courts of Section 42 USCS § 1983? 4. Where a Government in their official and or individual capacity; acts within Jurisdiction, yet still deprive a citizen his personal civil rights, is the official fully in protection of the Eleventh Amendment, and immune from suit, and free from correcting the deprivation? and if not or so where would correction lay? 5. Where a Government Official fails their duty to protect its Citizens of his Federal Constitution, and Civil Rights; even though the citizen shows serious structural and substantive procedural deprivations caused by the official, do that citizen stand the right to state a claim worth hearing under §1983 against that government official in their “official or individual capacity? I THE LIST OF ALL