Whether the Third Circuit's imposition of a categorical rule against bifurcation of trials involving catastrophic injuries violates the letter and spirit of Fed.R.Civ.P.42, conflicts with decisions from other circuit courts and shields bifurcation decisions from meaningful appellate review?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Third Circuit’s imposition of a categorical rule against bifurcation of trials involving catastrophic injuries violates the letter and spirit of Fed.R.Civ.P.42, conflicts with decisions from other circuit courts and shields bifurcation decisions from meaningful appellate review?