Whether the method of criminal prosecution violates a citizen's Second Amendment right of self-defense and due process protections under the Constitution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Is i} a Mi Callinge of Sustic fy @ Posecuelw te Krug ly Commif4 Napuc Violation to Deny a Citizen his Second Amendnent Light of SH Detinse Gad Fou teenth Amendninbt Due Pocus and eguel fratmat of dKlbat Just Fable Homicide lew and Dblahomas” Stand Your glowd” aids Dn munity Chus. Z Ts it a Misteitas of Duster br (A Appellee Cy uasel tb lompletly Viol, te the Lt Aencnmeat aad deny his chent Fepicurta tin in a Direct Ayal tor babyy ty bring | ford the prosceuboe Trteabions | Nepuc Violation, . 3 Mis Cattlase of Juste Schlip Chain ~ Petdsaw is Innocent of the Sustainable of finse of ruck becawe this 2nd Amendncnt Sell dehenn Fabbable Honeid falls inh a Pebak Selb dete SAuation and tunlir the Rule of Sustantin lev of the | 4M meadmiat Akhoae 1S guilty of No Chine: Y Dy Pecedual Bas Aly if A The Stoke vlaived the Proccd ute) bar thin +t tadled to bh ¢ objcchos/ Motion in fespensc to te fest Convichisant Plad the Peocedual Bae B The Stats Diticb (owl Dade Wat WU thook Tecrdihon A yy fhe Fatchad Buc n ths Case belsase Hu Shate Waived Het Poccdyal Lefanst, Ct Thi Pelibontg is Astthy, a Miscattirge of Dashive Elein because he is Tnnecent of the Sustantivt otfinge of Micde. _ in