Did the New York State Court of Appeals and Appellate Division improperly deny a firearms license application by disregarding the Bruen ruling and federal firearm possession stipulations?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Article 78 Proceeding decision was rendered based on willful false statements submitted to the court by The New York Police Department | Headquarters License Division. After providing accurate and documented proof . taken from the Answer and Verified Exhibits rendering each allegation as indeed false, should the Honorable Judge John J. Kelley have amended his decision? The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, denied the firearms license after receiving documented proof taken from the Answer and Verified Exhibits that each willful false statement submitted to The Article 78 Proceeding was indeed false; and The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, disregarded the federal stipulations of persons prohibited from possessing firearms; and The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, blatantly ignored the Bruen Ruling rendered by The Supreme Court of the United States in June 23, 2022, by unanimously deciding with The Article 78 Proceeding denial. Did the Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, deny my 2"4Amendment right without State or Federal legal cause? ’ ‘The New York State Court of Appeals decided with The Article 78 Proceeding and The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, without requiring documentation to support any of the Page | of XI willful false statements from The New York Police Department Headquarters License Division to include a criminal convictions record. The New York State Court of Appeals disregarded the federal stipulations of persons prohibited from possessing firearms, additionally The New York State Court of Appeals ignored the Bruen Ruling rendered by The Supreme Court of the United States in June 23, 2022, and thereby repeating the unsubstantiated decisions of The Article 78 Proceeding and The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department. Did the New York State Court of Appeals deny my 2n¢ Amendment right without State or Federal legal cause? The Sixth Amendment provides that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him; the right to confrontation includes the right of a military accused to cross-examine adverse witnesses. Moral character accusations were listed in the denials and dismissals of my firearms license application, the appeal, the Article 78 Proceeding, The Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, and the New York State Court of Appeals; and although the Sixth Amendment is limited to criminal prosecutions, should it apply with moral character accusations in civil proceedings as it relates to the violation(s) of other Constitution Amendments, such as the Second Amendment? Page | | of XI