Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals improperly denied habeas relief based on documentary evidence and constitutional violations

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . . I) Dik the lost Districd Court of kleberg County, Te kas abuse its discretion in nod granting Petitioner Rangel «toll . tuk fair tuiden trary hearing. thereby preventing Kenge row [revit his claim of & Const/ fe fioheal Violation of He UW Anentment of the 0S Constitvtion 7 2)z the Court of Criminal Appeels of Texas’ judgerrent baseclon a lowment with incorrect information and phétr pthusel fo tale notice of Petitioner's [efters/reqests an Untost! bhonal denial of Due [recess yniker the Kit Anerdrenf of the U.S. Constitution ? DARTIES petitvoner, [ro $€: Hugo Rangel-Rotello, #02258476, 899 PM 632, Kenedy, TX, 7P U4. Respondent : Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Crmival, ‘Appewly Division, Po Box |2548, Austin, 7X, 79 72548 RELA TED CASES ‘The State of Texas V Hvgo Range! “Botello, Cause ho. /5-CRFoo06-81, The /os* District Cour? of Kieberg County, FEKGS. Judgement enfered Ma y% Zol¢