No. 24-5867
Colt Jacoby Barnett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN OVERRULING MR. BARNETT’S OBJECTION TO THE TWO-LEVEL UPWARD ADJUSTMENT PURSUANT TO U:S.S.G. 2G2.2(B)(6) WHERE THERE IS THE USE OF A COMPUTER ? 2. IS THE FACTUAL BASIS TO SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT MR. BARNETT’S CONVICTIONS ? 3. DID THE DISTRICT COURT REVERSIBLY ERR BY DENYING MR. BARNETT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND THE DOCTRINE? ii
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Colt Jacoby Barnett
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent