No. 24-5871
Jeremy Travis Payne v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: biometric-data constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fifth-amendment self-incrimination testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the forced use of biometric data to unlock a cellphone constitutes a 'testimonial' act under the Fifth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Is the forced use by the police of a person’s biometrics to open a locked cellphone “testimonial” within the meaning of this Court’s Fifth Amendment precedent? i Statement of
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2024)
Attorneys
Jeremy Payne
Caroline Swift Platt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent