Whether the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals erred in affirming summary judgment eviction orders based on allegedly unconscionable lease agreements and potential violations of HUD Section 8 rules

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii erred when affirming the lower trial court’s rulings for two concurrent evictions both by Motions for Summary Judgment when each Rentat Lease filed with the Complaints was unconscionable? Do these actions constitute violations of Federal HUD Section 8 Rules, Policies and Procedures? Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii erred by avoiding parts of the Record to protect the trial judge’s actions, and if this constitutes violations of the Right to Due Process for a Fair and Impartiat Hearing of the Fifth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law?