No. 24-5880

Eric Schmidt v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law drug-offense mens-rea sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the presumption of mens rea applies to elements that increase statutory minimum and maximum penalties or only to elements that criminalize otherwise innocent conduct

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the presumption of mens rea only applies to elements that criminalize otherwise innocent conduct or instead also applies to elements that increase statutory minimum and maximum penalties. 2. Whether a knowingly or recklessly mens rea applies to the elements of drug type and quantity establishing mandatory minimum and enhanced maximum sentences under 21 U.S.C. § 841. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES . United States v. Eric Schmidt, No. 22CR00174-SB, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered March 1, 2023. . United States v. Eric Schmidt, No. 23-334, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered July 31, 2024. i

Docket Entries

2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2024)

Attorneys

Eric Schmidt
Benjamin Lee ColemanBenjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
Benjamin Lee ColemanBenjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent