No. 24-5882
Tyrone Greenfield v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-history judicial-discretion miscalculation procedural-error relevant-conduct sentencing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentence may be sustained if it relies upon an obvious and gross miscalculation pertaining to alleged wrongdoing that results in incorrect relevant conduct and assessment of criminal history points?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a sentence may be sustained if it relies upon an obvious and gross miscalculation pertaining to alleged wrongdoing that results in incorrect relevant conduct and assessment of criminal history points? i PARTIES TO PROCEEDING AND RELATED CASES There are no
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2024)
Attorneys
Tyrone Greenfield
Troy Nino Alexander Giatras — The Giatras Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent