Whether a trial court commits fundamental error by considering a subsequent offense without arrest or conviction when sentencing a probation violation from two years prior, and whether such sentencing based on the 'entire depth of her criminality' constitutes an unreasonable application of law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Is it fundamental error for a trial court to consider a subsequent offence without arrest or conviction is fashioning a sentence for a violation of probation which had been violated two (2) years prior? II. Is it an unreasonable application of law where a trial court imposes a sentence on a defendant for the “entire depth of her criminality” and not the actual violation of probation?