Whether the statute of limitations was improperly tolled under Chevron deference and Loper Bright Enterprises precedent, and whether Fifth and Seventh Amendment rights were violated in judicial proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Spurbeck’s right to sue’s tolling of statute of limitations applied under both overruled Chevron and new precedent dated June 28, 2024 Loper Bright ' Enterprises v. Raimondo. Why was Spurbeck’s right to sue not tolled? 2. The judicial emergency blocked Spurbeck’s Fifth Amendment and Seventh Amendment rights, and at one point, the district court abused the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to do so. Why were Spurbeck’s Fifth Amendment rights to “not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” and Seventh Amendment right to have a jury not provided to Spurbeck’s case including but not limited to Spurbeck’s EEOC right to sue even after Spurbeck preserved her jury? 1 “, i iy :