No. 24-5915

Willie D. Orr v. Zorian Trusewych, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review district-court in-forma-pauperis legal-procedure motion-to-proceed summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois err when granting defendants' summary judgment motion, and did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals err in affirming the judgment and denying plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. DID THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, ERR WHEN THE COURT GRANTED THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT? Il. WHAT LEVEL OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CONSTITUTES A DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE? : Til. DID THE U.S. APPELLATE COURT, FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ERR, WHEN THE COURT AFFIRMED THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND DENIED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HOLDING THAT PLAINTIFF HAD NOT INDENTIFIED A GOOD FAITH ISSUE?

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-25
Waiver of right of respondent Zorian Trusewych, et al. to respond filed.
2024-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2024)

Attorneys

Willie Orr
Willie Orr — Petitioner
Willie Orr — Petitioner
Zorian Trusewych, et al.
Dylan P. GradyBrown Hay & Stephens, LLP, Respondent
Dylan P. GradyBrown Hay & Stephens, LLP, Respondent