No. 24-592

Katia Gauthier, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Peter Gauthier, and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors D.G. and N.G. v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: freight-broker-liability motor-carrier-preemption negligent-hiring safety-exception transportation-regulation wrongful-death-claim
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a wrongful death or personal injury claim against a freight broker based on negligent hiring of an unsafe motor carrier falls within the safety exception to federal preemption of state transportation regulations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FA) preempts state laws related to motor carrier and broker prices, routes, and services, 49 U.S.C. § 14501()(1), but contains an exception from preemption—known as the safety exception—for the state’s “safety regulatory authority ... with respect to motor vehicles,” id. § 14501(c)(2)(A). The question presented is: Whether a wrongful death or personal injury claim against a freight broker that is based on the broker’s negligent hiring of an unsafe motor carrier to provide motor vehicle transportation invokes the state’s safety regulatory authority “with respect to motor vehicles,” and, thus, falls within the safety exception.

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-17
Waiver of Katia Gauthier of the 14-day waiting period submitted.
2024-12-17
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioners.
2024-12-10
Response to petition from respondent Total Quality Logistics, LLC filed.
2024-12-10
2024-11-26

Attorneys

Katia Gauthier
Adina H. RosenbaumPublic Citizen Litigation Group, Petitioner
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Kannon K. ShanmugamPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Respondent