Whether the Court can uphold constitutional rights in student loan bankruptcy matters while addressing potential separation of powers concerns

No question identified. : i Questions to Consider Can this Court, consistently with its obligations to uphold and to enforce the Constitution, trade the constitutionally guaranteed rights of millions of people to the protections of the Constitution’s enumerated separation of powers and its bill of rights, for the possibility of avoiding some difficulties that may arise from the finding of a separation of powers offense in student loan bankruptcy matters? If a separation of powers offense in student loan bankruptcy matters is found, would the actions of the Respondents be a fraud, a fraud on the court, civil rights violation, intention infliction of emotional distress, and legal malpractice? And would the finding justify an injunction to stop the separation of powers offense? The Respondents are United States corporations, law firms, attorneys, and citizens. Do they have a legal and ethical obligation to support, uphold, and have allegiance to the Constitution of the United States? If so, and it is found their actions are willful and violate and offend the Constitution, can a finding of wrongful treason be reasonable?