Whether the federal criminal courts can review structural defects in lower court proceedings when constitutional rights have potentially been violated

No question identified. : JY : | Queshins Fresen fed In the fedeva/ crimine/ Cases, this petition gresents fir the a Court te review, clo the stuchiol detects yresentin the. ae Criminal cases felau warrant outs mark reversal, Where arrass belsw were plain, effected pet honer’s Subsfontia/ rlohts, ane Serie sly ot fected fhe fairness, yifegrt ty and pra blic reputation ot whe Jucdtierd/ Proceeding $19 2 Const /tutional Arhicle IP court ths Courts sorececents gre tan estoblis the district court lacked! butt persinal Il precise Sub jeCH279 fer 4 fhe crimtng/ poroceedings 36 mnttio, 2) Whether fhis Court should reverse, Vacale, end remand to the Courts below, 46 reverse the coyst; tu honally intivm Federal crintinal Couvichans Yo protec? Ae High ds oY the pet boner Hat are 74et ere embedied in the Federal Constity hen, to moke godsd the wrong done fo Petitoner by the Government ond the courts belout, ~ /, Cast of Porhes AU porhes appear in the cop hon of phe case on the Cyer ke ; Rekted Cases oe : The Cases yelated 40 Shi's ge titan 1s See out th varigns forts of the Qpprndsk af¢ached ft thes gti Hon oe -// i. . Jable OF Lon fends Gpinions Belous / : Cons 4/Fu banal ond Statutory Provisions Iaylyed StL Statement of fre Cose Ss Reasons fov Grouting the Fel’hon . 8 Conclusion FF , Tadex to Appendices | Aypen dix A Court of Appeals for the FYE, Crear) Leusien Appenclix eB Decision ar the United Stofes Dishiek Coury.