Whether the DNA obtained from a suspect without a warrant and without probable cause violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments' due process protections

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED. 7 oo ee I) Whether CouEHARL was Yiied, Conuicte ch ) and , , Sentenced on burglary BL 2g V2 (Ay), belvind unconstitutional a — Mvidente ln vViclatiog of She UY and Ith Amendment to . he US. Constand re Ghio Const Act ) 8142 } , ; 2) Whether Xnere usas proladele cause to Support the oe _ Warrant issued on January 24, 2018 ; diel) created . Marea (4, 2018. B.C. best resuky used duaing \eial to» | Convick COLEMAN 7 a . 3) Was March 14,2018" Bat. Lest result used during | . ee, “rial bo ConvickCOLEMAN o violation of he Wh jth Amendment ty the United States Constitution and ne Ohio Constitution » ; , Ack VGA , : . : 4) Mec Setting Whe false Statements aside, in the Sworn . | ee WPidovit used ke “ey January 24" Zoe? Poreebully “kalting of COLE MANS DNA, woul rere \ove been sufficient evidence Yo bad Supported the Searcy warrant? ; Ce 5) \as Marca (42018 ° BG. Lest result used dung | a , oe Arial “Kruck-of She-poigon cus: \ree a : iv) Whether the DNA obtained tom CoLEMAN should : lhove leew excluded Grom evidance a3 Yre Produce of . o dekentton which was ‘Megal under Hae Wand 14th Amendment & . TDA ne police involuntarily yoke COLEMAN to Vhe Police Skation , placed Win in an Interrogation Toom , \nandeufted him +o a table and Voreefully yook his DNA without Probdole cause % BY Did dhe issuin ydge \nave 0 Sub Stantial \oasis Sor : Concluding Ano iol Cause existed ¢ Q) How did Cove nan Lbecome Q Suspect to \rave len . arrested, Charged jand prosecured 1D) Was Prodoalcle Cause lacking on the Pace of the WN) Did Debeckive Tanisha Stewart Finowinglly and delibberately With reckless disregard Yor Yhe Leu, make Dolse stake ments | in hee swoon ofhidauit ko create Prokalele Cause @ | a . .