No. 24-5959

Robert Ellis v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2024-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assigned-counsel attorney-client-relationship continuity-of-representation court-discretion indigent-defendant sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2024-12-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

When counsel has been assigned to represent an indigent defendant, has developed a close working relationship, and faces no obstacles to continuing the representation, can a court arbitrarily assign different counsel without any inquiry or grounds or does the defendant have a Sixth Amendment right to continuity of assigned counsel?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When counsel has been assigned to represent an indigent defendant, has developed a close working relationship, and faces no obstacles to continuing the representation, can a court arbitrarily assign different counsel without any inquiry or grounds or does the defendant have a Sixth Amendment right to continuity of assigned counsel?

Docket Entries

2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-11-22
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2024)

Attorneys

New York
John M. Castellano — Respondent
Robert Ellis
William Geoffrey KastinAppellate Advocates, Petitioner