Whether a federal prisoner's multiple appeals of a 2255 motion and unresolved search warrant issues constitute grounds for mandamus relief

Questions Presented 1.) If the petitioner had two appeals on his 2255 motion and the second appeal was correct under Fed. R. App. P. (4) (a) (4) (a) (IV), does foreclose his right to be heard? 2.) By precluding a party’s right to be heard on an issue concerning count one of his Jencks material that was given to him at trial, does that effect his opportunity2atpel i@ FQ 3.) If a search warrant was unreturned under rule 41 (F) of the Fed. R.Crim.P. and used against the petitioner at his jury trial, then added to his 2255 by the judge does this entail a fraud placed on the court? a | Relief Sought The petitioner prays for relief in the form of mandamus being issued to the Sixth Circuit Judges in the “parties” section of this writ allowing petitioner Heard to petition under the rules and standards of the Rules Governing 2255 motions. He also ask this Honorable court review his Jencks material given to him in regards to the testimony of one detective Danielle Barto in case 11-cr-73-73-Jbc on June 2, 2011 in the Eastern District of Kentucky concerning count one. He lastly ask that his search warrant in case 11mj-5060-REW on June 5, 2011 in the eastern District of Kentucky be stricken upon review from this court of the record(s) of the above mentioned documents. , tr