Whether Chief Judge Smith violated 28 USC 352(a) by determining disputed facts in Mr. Gregory's complaint against district court judges and whether Mr. Gregory was denied due process and fair judicial review

ISSUES PRESENTED ti). DID CHIEF JUDGE SMITH VIOLATED 28 USC 352 (A) BY DETERMING DISPUTED FACT. IN MR.GREGGORY!'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DISTRICT JUBGE STEVEN BCUGH AND OTHER APPEALLANT COURT JUDGES. (2). WAS MR.GREGCRY DENIED A PAIR AND UNFARTIAL REVIEW BY THE JUDICAL COUNCEL. . (3). WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO HAD HIS COMPLAINT APFEAL REVIEW BY A FIVE-JUDGE PANEL. PARTIES ENVOLVED (1).Chief Judge Smith-8th Circuit, (2). Judges of the 8th Circuit Judical Council, Circuit Judge Jane Kelly, United States Dist Judge Roberto A. Lange, Dist Judge Beth Phillips, Dist Judge J.P. Marshall, Jr. and United Dist Judge M. Rese. v4 . ae ty JURISDICTION OF THE COURT _ The United States Supreme Court has jursdiction pursuant to federal law 28 §1651; The all writs act aad Supreme Court Fule -20. iy ot, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF WRIT OF MANDMUS . Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of mandamus be: issue against the judgements below. OPINIONS BELOW [ J For case from federai«courts; The opinion of the United states. court appeals appears at