Whether a criminal defendant's constitutional rights were violated when trial counsel failed to challenge potentially coerced evidence and suppressed testimony under Brady v. Louisiana

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . “T. Where PeXtione’s ObSechive Was To Addintdin Lonaceme. Of the Charged Criminal Acas. Wos + Un Constitutional, When Triat Counsel Overcede “Thet Decision Qnd Conceded Guivt, In Vidlotion OF McCoY v_ Lovisana? | IL -Wos 2 Lnlonstituhoncl. tuhen Tevet Counsel Fetled To “Chollenge The Voluntoriness &F etrtioner’s Can¥ession. there “We Uolontroverted erndene. Was trot & Co Nelendedt! Uncle bos heaustk Into The Interosotion Qoom Te Coewe a Cabessian? : | '