No. 24-5995
Manuel Espinoza-Camacho v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split judicial-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors? i
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent