May the Court of Appeals withdraw the briefing schedule after approving a notice of appeal and deny a request for appointed counsel, thereby violating due process rights?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED, | May the Court of Appeals , after approving a notice of appeal, withdraw the briefira, schedule. on the basis thet I requested appoivitment of counsel | to assist me in presenting my claim ? Thereby, , the court became aware, thot even though T had o legitimate legal issue TL was not able of presenting, the problem by, muself, in immediacy. Thus, the court bullied me with an oder to show cause. Uttimotel, , denied my request to ceinstate my appeal and then Affirmed the district coucts decision that contained an impermissible fulinay. A\l done in violation of the Cat of due Process . : 77 Tf the district court eroneovsly rechatacterized a Patties Rule 33 wdi4) new trialmotion , that was submitted under Criminal Rule 37 during the divect appeal , aS a motion fir collateral relief under title 82255. Thus , prevented a timely, assertion of the mation before the Court & Appeals officmed the conviction. Tf the date that the initial motion was submitted eqpitably olla the time for review reqatdless that the Rule 37 motion was filed ofter the direct appeal due 4p the district court's own improper action that caused the filing delow, May the Court © efuse to correct +theit own , intentional, clerical error 2 . And is the district court's interpretation of Federal Rules of Criminal Rocedue Stocute of limitotions not subject ‘to review throvah a Second appeal 2 "