Whether the Supreme Court should issue a permanent injunction against state courts that have created an absolute bar to seeking Supreme Court review through fraudulent court actions and failure to provide certified orders

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Should the US. Supreme Court intervene in protection of itsgapellate jucisdiztion by issuing a permanent injunction against the highest courts of appeals in Texas, said courts having erected an ABSOLUTE BAR, for petitioners seeking review in the U.S. Supreme Court via ZB USCS $1257, oF 28 uScS $1254, said petitioner (s\ having the right to utilize the Statute ) and having no other avenue to enforce thei right to seek U.S. Supreme Court review. That bar created, and made effective through: the faudulent report, of publication ofa purported “Notice of Action, which is not representative of a REN DERED ORDER delivered by a legally cognizable body of rhe respective court? . 2. Is it Ok, For elected state court of Prcials to defraud, or _ Inanipulate the federal courts into abstaining frum the review of daimed violations of federal, and state Constitutional Rights, in either civil or ériminal cases, through a contrived _ Scheme, wherein State actors Communicate an alleged decision har been reached, all without the court having RENDERED AN ORDER, the courts Cleck Rucrher being UNABLE To , -PRov2DE A CERTIFIED COPY OF ANY ORDER(S) PROVING , FINAL STATE ACTION? | ii oO a>»?