No. 24-6023
Leonardo Terrazas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment inevitable-discovery law-enforcement search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit's application of the inevitable-discovery doctrine conflicts with Supreme Court precedent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Fifth Circuit’s application of the inevitablediscovery doctrine—based on its assumption that officers would have discovered the same evidence they found by violating the Fourth Amendment even if they had acted lawfully—directly conflicts with this Court’s precedent.
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Leonardo Terrazas
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent