Whether the trial court violated constitutional due process by admitting unfairly prejudicial hearsay evidence from an internet website and whether defense attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the trial court violated Glenna Mary Duram’s constitutional protections of , ; due process by admitting unfairly prejudicial hearsay evidence from an internet : website. The admission of the hearsay website was unfairly prejudicial to . : defendant-appellant and misleading to the jury. Should the trial court have excluded the evidence? ; “IL Whether both defense attorneys provided state and federal constitutionally ineffective assistance as trial counsel for failing to call any witnesses on Ms. Duram’s behalf, allowing . biased jurors to remain, failing to file any pretrial motions to exclude evidence, and failing to ; procure expert forensic, DNA, and medical experts on Ms. Duram’s behalf. I. Whether both defense attorney provided state and federal constitutional ineffective assistance as appellate counsel for failing to raise the issues of merit in issue I above and for failing to advise Ms. Duram of the potential conflict of interest and consequences of having both trial attorneys also act as appellate counsel on her behalf. . > t &