No. 24-6041
Daniel Hampton v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split claims-processing federal-rules jurisdictional-rules statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is jurisdictional or claims processing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : i QUESTION RAISED I 1. Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is jurisdictional or claims processing? 2. Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) preempts a properly filed initial notice of appeal, under FRAP Rule 3 (a)1, and when postjudgment Order (relief) affirms original Order; in processing an appellate claim. 3. Whether FRAP Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is overbroad and ambiguous, hence facially unconstitutional considering 28 U.S.C §2107’s jurisdictional mandate.
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent McDonough, Denis to respond filed.
2024-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)
Attorneys
Daniel Hampton
McDonough, Denis
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent