No. 24-6041
Daniel Hampton v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split claims-processing federal-rules jurisdictional-rules statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is jurisdictional or claims processing?
2. Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) preempts a properly filed initial notice of appeal, under FRAP Rule 3 (a)1, and when postjudgment Order (relief) affirms original Order; in processing an appellate claim.
3. Whether FRAP Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is overbroad and ambiguous, hence facially unconstitutional considering 28 U.S.C §2107's jurisdictional mandate.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) is jurisdictional or claims processing?
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent McDonough, Denis to respond filed.
2024-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)
Attorneys
Daniel Hampton
McDonough, Denis
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent