Whether a simple misdemeanor involving an allegedly defective cement mixer warrants Supreme Court review to address potential public safety issues and constitutional due process violations

Questions Presented for Review : Such as an inferior cement mixer as shown during trial, are there circumstances that necessitate appeals of simple misdemeanors?: To safeguard Constitutional rights? In the presence of an ongoing, evident public safety issue of increasing national relevance? Such as due compensation for life having been at stake while shedding light on a national public safety issue, amidst numerous Constitutional rights and due process violations, should the US Supreme Court ultimately rule in Petitioner Hackett's favor and simultaneously grant Petitioner emotional and punitive damages from Iowa, where circumstances dictate an inherent waiver of sovereign immunity? i Reference to the opinions below. Rule 14.1(d): Grundy, IA's District Court docket STA0036862, Judge Wagner's 7/10/2024 written Trial Disposition and Judge Dalrymple's 9/3/2024 Appeal Denial ignore evidence, opting to blame the driver, supported by Iowa Supreme Court's docket 24-1449, Judge Oxley's 10/4/2024 denial for discretionary review & lowa Supreme Court's 3 judge panel affirmation of denying discretionary review 10/28/2024. Concise statement of the grounds on which jurisdiction is invoked. Rule 14.1(e): Appealed timely by reason of ignoring evidence 9/17/2024, Iowa Supreme Court 24-1449, Judge Oxley on 10/4/2024 denies discretionary review of Trial Court's Disposition and Judge Dalrymple's 9/3/2024 Appeal Denial, citing no right to . appeal simple misdemeanors. Iowa Supreme Court affirmation filing 10/28/2024. The provisions involved in the case. Rule 14.1(f): Failure to Maintain Control in violation of Iowa Code 321.288(1). A concise