No. 24-6044
Antonio Shropshire v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure government-seizure sixth-amendment testimonial-autonomy trial-preparation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were Shropshire's Sixth Amendment rights violated by the government's seizure of trial preparation documents and interference with his testimonial autonomy?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Were Shropshire’s Sixth Amendment rights violated by the government’s seizure of his trial preparation documents? 2. Did the government violate Shropshire’s choice whether to testify, in violation of his Sixth Amendment autonomy interest? ii
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent