No. 24-6048
Cheryl Christin Kissentaner v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split diaz-precedent evidentiary-standard federal-evidence-rule judicial-review legal-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court clarify its prior decision in Diaz v. United States to resolve the ongoing circuit split concerning the interpretation of Federal Evidence Rule 704(b)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should this Court clarify its prior decision in Diaz v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1727 (2024), to resolve the ongoing circuit split concerning the interpretation of Federal Evidence Rule 704(b)? i
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-12
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2024)
Attorneys
Cheryl Kissentaner
Rosa Victoria Garcia-Cross — Federal Public Defender's Office , Petitioner
Rosa Victoria Garcia-Cross — Federal Public Defender's Office , Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent