Whether petitioner was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel's inactions and failure to properly object to jury instructions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW First Question Was Petitioner Denied His Constitutional Right To Fair Trial And The Effective Assistance Of Counsel Where A Multitude Of Inactions On The : Part Of Trial Counsel, Denied Him A Fair Trial Proceeding, Pursuant To U.S. Const., Amends VI, XIV; Mich. Const. 1968, Art. 1, §20, Where; Second Question Petitioner Submits That He was denied his due process right to a properly instructed jury and the effective assistance of counsel where his attorney did not object when the trial court failed to instruct the jury that Mr. Childs was not obligated to attempt to retreat before using deadly force to defend himself and that his belief that deadly force was necessary was presumptively reasonable, Pursuant To U.S. Const., Amends VI, XIV; Mich. Const. 1968, Art. 1, §20, Where; i