Whether a Second Circuit ruling violates federal prohibitions on cross-border cannabis transactions and interstate commerce regulations

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . » “Does a Second Pre Securionand Kcial forthe same oenve Vidlate a Coaski kukional amon of the defen dank? » bohether Hye “Double Teopardy pre bikion bars successive federal pres< cCukons of the Same Person fo the Same acts even though The pro Secutions acre brought un der federal Sinhutes protecting Dif Rerenk federa\ inbenesh. . » Con a defendant whe pleads avilly te conduct which incalve’ a Shooting . y = 4 whiel belt an individual paralyzedjand is Prem sed'no firther presecabion’ — ~ |: iS Sawn eondoctk lsed on ecusritten Pleaacceenent, be re-~indicte® on” $ ne a ee ee C Lbe vicki ares lyr afler Heintlichon oFHe wound, or e he , . 7 2 Dees thee Doeable Teogardy Clause. protect Adal rgb a Seton t prosecution for the came offense ; when a delndant pleads avilky fo Hevef lense Onder a wr tte plea Agreement which prom seS No farther prosecution