Question not identified.

No question identified. : Questions 1. How can one argue their position on a matter without being argumentative? 2. How are precedents created? . 3. Can evidence be materially relevant and non-material at the same time? 4. What is the definition of “Adverse” according to the black law dictionary 5. If some evidence is consider inconclusive and neither material nor exculpatory then wouldn’t the evidence, that it is consistent with, be consider non-material and exculpatory as well? 6. This is one question but it will be asked two different ways; How is evidence that is contain within exhibits consider additional grounds though it wasn’t mention in the petition as one/ How is evidence that wasn’t mention in the petition as a ground not relevant when this evidence is contain within exhibits? 7. Shouldn’t a decision makers ruling be practical and not in opposition to one party or the . other? 8. Ifthe evidence never existed? ‘ oo, 9. IfJ.Anton, the DHO made a false and misleading statement pertaining to when and where DNA testing was appropriate that went against the policy and procedure at that time. How is she not bias or prejudices toward me or this particular situation? 10. 28 USCS § 455 (b) (1). Ifa judge has knowledge of a parties misconduct and decides to ignore or disregard it like it didn’t happen, doesn’t that indicate some kind of personal bias towards the opposing party or favorable of some sort toward the other?? 11. ifnot, how not so? Please elaborate. 12. Shouldn’t our judges and enforces of our laws be trustworthy? 13. What is a few sure ways to lose the publics respect and trust? 14. What does, in the interest of justice mean??