Whether fraud on the court occurred through improper government motions depriving petitioner of due process and compulsory process rights in asset seizure proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Fraud on the Court occurred when the Government’s Motion for Protective Order and the Order, were. considered yalid even, wee, though they were not procedurally applied to Petitioner because Petitioner was not named nor served; thereby depriving Petitioner of Due Process Rights and the opportunity to object to redaction of important dispavery and witnesses and denying Petitioner the compulsory process for obtaining witnesses and evidence in her favor to present a complete defefise in violation of the Compulsory Process Clause of the United 1 States. eT at Constitution, Amendment VI. ¢_2, Whether Petitioner's rights from illegal seizure of assets by. 3. Government agency were violated when the Motion and Order of Forfeiture . CMA PUTUTATS BMOMIVOAT TAMOMT ITE Y) For Substitute Proper) did not couaply With the supulations an the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 "and conflicted with.21 U.S. 853(p).-. A249 SHT HO THETA? Bic cet tie ee PRUE ARP MO CUART. 1 Gee bo need Reef ca tebe) ociocion? bm note adT . 4 _.— TABLEOFCONTENTS Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW...