Does the 'probing and fact-specific analysis' mandated by Strickland v. Washington and Sears v. Upton require courts to weigh both the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution's evidence when determining whether a criminal defendant was prejudiced by his counsel's deficient performance?

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the “probing and fact-specific analysis” mandated by Strickland v. Washington and Sears v. Upton require courts to weigh both the strengths and weakness of the prosecution’s evidence when determining whether a criminal defendant was prejudiced by his counsel’s deficient performance? i