No. 24-606

Christine A. Arakelian v. Ashley Pollard, et al.

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2024-12-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment constitutional-law due-process federal-preemption state-court-procedure supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Prince William County Circuit Court and Supreme Court of Virginia err in dismissing Petitioner's case by violating her 14th Amendment rights and disregarding federal preemption principles?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Prince William County Circuit Court err as a matter of federal, constitutional law when it did not grant the Petitioner's motion for partial summary judgment that (a) the section of the Virginia Code pertaining to Boards of Equalization is unconstitutionally vague and violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and (b) the two Respondents violated the Petitioner’s 14th Amendment rights as a matter of law? 2. Did the Supreme Court of Virginia err as a matter of federal, constitutional law when it held that there is no reversible error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia, thereby upholding the Court of Appeals’ dismissal of Petitioner's appeal for a so-called “missed deadline”, even . though both the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals, by the very act itself of dismissing the Petitioner’s case for a spurious, baseless allegation of a “missed deadline”, discriminated against federal causes of action in state court in violation of the Supremacy Clause and disregarded this Court’s case law on federal preemption in 42 U.S.C. §1983 cases? f ii

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-15
Reply of petitioner Christine A. Arakelian filed.
2025-01-15
2025-01-03
Brief of Christopher Falcon in opposition submitted.
2025-01-03
Brief of respondents Christopher Falcon, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-01-03
2024-12-16
Waiver of Ashley Pollard of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent Ashley Pollard to respond filed.
2024-11-26

Attorneys

Ashley Pollard
John D. McGavinMcGavin, Boyce, Bardot, Thorsen and Katz, PC, Respondent
John D. McGavinMcGavin, Boyce, Bardot, Thorsen and Katz, PC, Respondent
Christine A. Arakelian
Christine A. Arakelian — Petitioner
Christine A. Arakelian — Petitioner
Christopher Falcon
David Drake HudginsHudgins Law Firm, P.C., Respondent
David Drake HudginsHudgins Law Firm, P.C., Respondent