No. 24-6060

Albert Trampis Dogskin v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split false-information judicial-discretion plea-agreement sentencing-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there is an exception to an appeal waiver in a plea agreement where the district court relied on false or unreliable information in sentencing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether there is an exception to an appeal waiver in a plea agreement where the district court relied on false or unreliable information in sentencing. ii RULE 14.1(B)(iii) STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington: United States v. Albert Trampis Dogskin, No. 2:22-Cr-00122-SAB (Sept. 6, 2024) (amended judgment). United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: United States v. Albert Trampis Dogskin, No. 23-4301 (June 20, 2024) (order dismissing appeal for appellate waiver); United States v. Albert Trampis Dogskin, No. 23-4301 (August 27, 2024) (order on motion for reconsideration).

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-12
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2025)

Attorneys

Albert Trampis Dogskin
Sandy BaggettSandy Baggett, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent