Earlando Samuel v. Delaware County Housing Authority, et al.
SocialSecurity Privacy
Whether the lower court erred in denying appointment of counsel under the Fair Housing Act's retaliation clause and whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals improperly denied a Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Did the lower court for The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania err in the decision to deny me the appointment of a attorney pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Retaliation clause -The Fair Housing Act prohibits retaliation against people because they have exercised their rights or assisted others in doing.so. The relevant section of the FHA is section 818, which states that it is illegal to “coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with anyone because they have exercised a protected right." ? | was deemed to be disabled by the Social Security Administration in 1995. Their was no reason given for the denials of my motions for an appointment of a attorney by the Judges from Eastern District Court Of Pennsylvania. 2. Did the Third Circuit Court Of Appeals err by denying my Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment? A judgment against me was entered by the District Court for Eastern District Of Pennsylvania . | filed a Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment by the Third circuit Of Appeals that was also denied. There was not a reason given by the Third Circuit Of Appeals for their denial of my Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment.