Did the Supreme Court of Florida abuse its discretion by issuing a per curiam decision without reviewing the merits of Corey Rogers' case, and did the dismissal of his petition alleging unlawful detention constitute a fundamental due process error?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Supreme Court of Florida abuse its discretion when it failed to review the case of Corey Rogers vs. Ricky D. Dixon . Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 380 So. 3d 513 (Fla. 2024) where petitioner’s appealed to the First ‘District Court of Appeal State of Florida was decided by being Per Curiam containing a statement or citation establishing a point of law upon which the decision Rests. (Citing) Persuad vs. State, 838 So.2d 529; 2003 Fla. Lexis 48; 28 Fla. L. Weekly S 75? Is it a fundamental error to dismiss a petitioner’s petition that alleged that he is being unlawfully detained by the Department of Corrections without lawful authority that deprived him of his liberty and is illegally detained against his will; upon a void indictment handed down by the Grand Jury of the State of Florida that failed to charge all essential elements that constitute, the crime charged, constituting a due process violation of a judgments of conviction and sentence for crimes not charged in the indictment which can be raised at any time? (Citing) Santana vs. Henry, 62 So. 3d 1122; 2011 Fla. Lexis 997; 36 Fla. L. Weekly S 191; Santana vs. Henry, 12 So. 3d 843, 846 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)? 2of