Whether a state's forensic evidence preservation statute that allows destruction of evidence after a specified time period is consistent with a criminal defendant's constitutional due process rights

estions Preserteh \, Shether ‘allow Ba OX ert witadSS To Aisevs$ OTherY Test Monte| STatemeaTS iF The Testimonmal STTementS were Nov ThemSel es adrtied AS evidence 15 Consistent with the Con€rentaTion Clavie. foe Bull caming Mew Merico, Sey US. —~ (BIS, Ge. 2705, 272% (201!) (Cont. apn, per Soonayt,s a 22 herler allres.« Softrogare DN \ exert To acl aS a Condvir Fer ~ The actuu| BNA one ysr's Conclusions Where The lal FefocT \TSAE 1S Never adourted ; taney dence. at Tel 1S Cais Tent with The Confer. onration Clause. eee we OT 0 I ee = me t—‘S + a Wye NL we