No. 24-609

James L. Martin v. David H. Nixon

Lower Court: Delaware
Docketed: 2024-12-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-judgment due-process-clause escheat fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment takings-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause protect a civil judgment creditor from escheat when the judgment debtor demands satisfaction and release of claim prior to payment?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Do the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and the , Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause protect a civil judgment creditor, in a state court, from escheat where the judgment debtor demands a satisfaction and release of claim prior to payment?

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-12-30
Brief of David H. Nixon in opposition submitted.
2024-12-30
2024-12-02
2024-09-20
Application (24A281) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 6, 2024.
2024-09-14
Application (24A281) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2024 to December 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

David H. Nixon
Edward F. KafaderFerry Joseph, P.A. , Respondent
Edward F. KafaderFerry Joseph, P.A. , Respondent
James L. Martin
James L. Martin — Petitioner
James L. Martin — Petitioner