No. 24-609
James L. Martin v. David H. Nixon
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause protect a civil judgment creditor from escheat when the judgment debtor demands satisfaction and release of claim prior to payment?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Do the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and the , Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause protect a civil judgment creditor, in a state court, from escheat where the judgment debtor demands a satisfaction and release of claim prior to payment?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-12-30
Brief of David H. Nixon in opposition submitted.
2024-12-30
Brief of respondent David H. Nixon in opposition filed.
2024-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2025)
2024-09-20
Application (24A281) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 6, 2024.
2024-09-14
Application (24A281) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2024 to December 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
David H. Nixon
Edward F. Kafader — Ferry Joseph, P.A. , Respondent
Edward F. Kafader — Ferry Joseph, P.A. , Respondent