Question not identified.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I) Did petitioner have due provess rights regarding indictment by Grand Ut, Whore the state in which the trial took Place enshrines the riakt +0 in dick ment in its state comstitution $ QD i the ansiter te Iuestion (1) 15 Yess thea does an amendmont of sulstance divestthatcial court of sucisd ction 7 3) DidFrial court subcdantislY Amend the indictment by cleakiwe A eu! Chavte od the Same i' Me Place Pelitiower in IéoPardy twice forthe Stme offense after Seotatay AAchCaL, inv violation of th, 5%, G2 nol {4th Amundments , Double Seorardy clause, AiGkttowotice and Due Process clises of the U.S. Coastitetion?