Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on ineffective counsel, plea agreement terms, and mental disability claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO BE RESENTENCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT THAT INVOLVES A "QUID PRO QUO" AND WAS HIS COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL 2. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO HAVE ALL SENTENCES TO RUN "CONCURRENT" SINCE NO MENTION OF "CONCURRENT" OR "CONSECUTIVE" SENTENCES WERE EVER EVEN MENTIONED IN HIS PLEA AGREEMENT OFFER. 3. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO HAVE HIS "NO_PAROLE" STIPULATION REMOVED AFTER 42 YEARS OF INC; ARCERATION SINCE HE HAD AND HAS MENTAL DISABILITIES THAT PROVES MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES AND THAT HE WAS INCOMPETENT TO _ENTER HIS GUILTY PLEAS.