No. 24-6107

Marcus Albert Rambo v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-10
Status: GVR
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: as-applied-challenge circuit-split constitutional-rights criminal-procedure second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant may raise an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) after Bruen and Rahimi, and if so, whether the Second Amendment is unconstitutional as applied to a defendant with only non-violent priors

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether after New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) and United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S.__, 144 U.S. 144 S.Ct. 1889 (2024), a criminal defendant may raise an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (2) If so, whether under the Bruen/Rahimi methodology, the Second Amendment is unconstitutional as applied to a defendant like Petitioner with only non-violent priors. i INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)(i), Petitioner submits that there are no

Docket Entries

2025-03-28
Judgment Issued.
2025-02-24
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. 680 (2024).
2025-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-22
Reply of Marcus Albert Rambo submitted.
2025-01-22
Reply of petitioner Marcus Albert Rambo filed.
2025-01-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2025)

Attorneys

Marcus Albert Rambo
Brenda Greenberg BrynFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent